·Î°í
HOME CONTACT US
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ °ÇÃà±â°è¼³ºñ°ø»ç ½ÅÀç»ý¿¡³ÊÁö(Áö¿­ ³Ã/³­¹æ) ä¿ëÁ¤º¸ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ ¹®ÀÇÇϱâ ÀÚ·á½Ç °øÁö»çÇ×
¹®ÀÇÇϱâ
ÀÚ·á½Ç
°øÁö»çÇ×
1:1 »ó´ã¸®½ºÆ®



  HOME > °í°´¼¾ÅÍ > ¹®ÀÇÇϱâ
Á¦¸ñ   axrVCwdmrCdVvgMI
ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ   Bobby
ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£   Á¶È¸¼ö   265
µî·ÏÀÏ   2019/07/26 (18:01)
³» ¿ë We"ve got a joint account http://voyeurweb.in.net/ private voyeur I believe that the Federal government should not be doing most of the things that it currently does.  I’d prefer a much smaller government.  But I also believe the government shutdown is a sort of “real shock,” which makes the economy less efficient in the short run.  Thus shutting down the National Parks is not small government.  Privatizing the National Parks would be small government. Having the government heavily involved in the paperwork necessary to get home loan mortgages and then suddenly shutting down those functions so that it’s really hard to get mortgages is not a move toward smaller government. Removing the government entirely from the mortgage issuing process would represent smaller government.
¸®½ºÆ®·Î ´ä±Û´Þ±â ¼öÁ¤Çϱâ Áö¿ì±â
[°ü·ÃµÈ ±Û º¸±â]
41205 axrVCwdmrCdVvgMI Bobby 2019.07.26 265

ȸ»ç¼Ò°³
°ÇÃ༳ºñ°ø»ç
½ÅÀç»ý¿¡³ÊÁö
¿À½Ã´Â±æ
(ÁÖ)º¸¶÷¿£Áö´Ï¾î¸µ
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ¿À½Ã´Â±æ e-mail
1998 BORAM-ENG company. All rights reserved
[143-220] ¼­¿ïƯº°½Ã ±¤Áø±¸ Á߰ 341-18       Tel : 02)3437-0901